ArXiv

A prominent professor of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and computational linguistics recently called arXiv as “cancer.”

What is arXiv?

• ArXiv is a free distribution service and an open-access archive of scholarly articles in the fields of physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, electrical engineering, etc.
• ArXiv process skips peer review.
  • Preprints or research papers that are not peer-reviewed, help scientists keep up with the latest findings.
• This practice was started when National Institute of Health (NIH) of U.S. developed a method for researchers to share early work with their peers.
• This switched online and later translated to a portal known as arXiv.
• It follows a moderation system that publishes a paper if no flags are raised by a moderator within a day after the paper is submitted.

Arguments against arXiv:

• Dissemination of junk science in a format indistinguishable from real publications.
• Slow moderation process which is opaque and inconsistent.
• Lack of interesting or original questions.
• Biased in favor of influential researchers or companies.
• Automatic endorsement policy based on subject area, topic, past work, and academic affiliation.
• Diminished the value for peer review.
• Misuse and misinformation by some researchers.
• Promotes a hectic schedule that removes content older than 6 months

Arguments in favour of arXiv:

• Invaluable for most independent researchers.
• Free access for students in AI research and Generative AI platform.
• Reduction in wait cycles.

Ref: Source