Skip links

Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954

Drugs and Magic Remedies IAS TOPPERS

The Supreme Court recently prohibited an Ayurved company from misleading claims to treat certain diseases, as a violation to Drugs and Magic Remedies Act, 1954.

Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954
[Ref- Business Standard]

Key provisions of Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954:

  • This Act is a legislative framework to control the advertisement of drugs and prohibit claims of magical qualities in remedies.
  • It encompasses various forms of advertisements, including written, oral, and visual mediums.
  • The term “drug” refers to medicines intended for human or animal use, substances for diagnosis or treatment of diseases, and articles affecting the body’s functions.
  • The definition for “magic remedy” extends to talismans, mantras, and charms that allegedly possess miraculous powers for healing or influencing bodily functions.

Regulations on advertisements under the Act:

  • The Act imposes strict regulations on the publication of advertisements related to drugs.
  • It prohibits advertisements that give false impressions, make false claims, or are otherwise misleading.
  • Violations of these provisions can result in penalties, including imprisonment or fines, upon conviction.
  • The term “advertisement,” under the Act, extends to all notices, labels, wrappers, and oral announcements.
  • The Act applies to all individuals and entities involved in the publication of advertisements, including manufacturers, distributors, and advertisers.
  • The Act can hold both individuals and companies accountable for contraventions.
  • If a company violates the act, individuals in charge of its business operations may be deemed guilty unless proven lack of knowledge or due diligence in preventing the offense.
  • Directors, managers, or officers of the company may be held liable if they consented to or neglected the offense.
  • In case of first conviction for the violator, up to six months in prison, fines or both may be charged, and for subsequent conviction, imprisonment may extend to one year.
  • The Act does not include any limits for the fines that may be imposed on individuals or organizations.
UPSC IAS Preparation Resources
Current Affairs AnalysisTopperspedia
GS ShotsSimply Explained
Daily Flash CardsDaily Quiz

Leave a comment