Land Revenue Systems in British India

The three main Land Revenue Systems in British India were: Zamindari System, where taxes were collected by landlords; the Ryotwari System, which involved direct tax collection from individual cultivators; and the Mahalwari System, where tax collection was the responsibility of village headmen. Each system had distinctive impacts on society and agricultural practices, with the Zamindari System causing commercialization of land, the Ryotwari system offering cultivators more freedom in crop choice, and the Mahalwari system leading to joint responsibility of villages for land revenue assessment. In this article, you will know all about three different types of land revenues systems in British India and its impacts. To explore more interesting UPSC Modern Indian History topics of GS Paper – 1 like Land Revenue Systems in British India, check out other articles and IAS Notes of IASToppers.   

Table of Content

• Land Revenue Systems in British India
• Background of Land Revenue Systems in British India
• Zamindari System
• Ryotwari System
• Mahalwari System
• Differences Between Zamindari, Ryotwari and Mahalwari Systems
• Similarities Between Zamindari, Ryotwari and Mahalwari Systems
• Conclusion
• FAQs on Land Revenue Systems in British India

Land Revenue Systems in British India

• Historically, land taxes were a significant income source for rulers and emperors. Over time, the model of land ownership has evolved significantly.
• In the monarchy era, land was distributed as Jagirs, managed by appointed Jagirdars.
• The Jagirdars further divided their land, assigning it to Zamindars of lower rank. Zamindars had the responsibility of getting the land farmed by peasants and collected a portion of their earnings as tax.
• During the British rule in India, 3 main Land Revenue Systems were introduced:
  • The Zamindari System
  • The Mahalwari System
  • The Ryotwari System

Background of Land Revenue Systems in British India

• Before land revenue system of British rule, the income generated from the land was utilized to sustain the state’s administration and fulfil the needs of people associated with the state.
• The late Mughal era and successor regimes frequently auctioned land revenue collection rights to the highest bidders, a method also adopted by Warren Hastings in Bengal.
• This led to a range of problems such as profit speculation, and revenue collection was unpredictable, causing financial instability.
• The colonial state required consistent income from land revenues to finance its trade operations, expand its troops, and conquer new territories.
• The process of introducing new ways of collecting revenue led to several discussions, such as deciding on land ownership, and who would collect the state’s share of agricultural produce.
• The resolution of these issues varied by region and time, resulting in different types of land-revenue settlements.
• A central aspect of British land revenue policy was the introduction of private property in land in India, meaning certain individuals were given ownership rights.
• Even though, in pre-colonial times, there existed a vast system of leasing and sub-leasing revenues, and farmers had certain land rights, there were no clear ownership rights.
• The British granted such rights to specific groups based on local conditions, thus favouring some landowners and integrating them into the colonial agricultural structure. These groups eventually became strong supporters of the British.
• Early British land revenue policy also aimed at increasing land-revenue demand to its highest.
• Land revenue was now set in cash, often at exorbitant rates, rather than as a share of produce. As agricultural prices fell, the load became heavier, especially in the settlements introduced by Pringle and Wingate in the Bombay Presidency.
• As a result, farmers borrowed money from rural lenders to avoid defaults. Land sales and auctions increased as farmers used their new land ownership rights as collateral for loans. If they couldn’t repay, they lost their lands, leading to agrarian stress.
• In addition, most farmers were left with few resources to purchase goods from British industries.
• In order to maintain social stability and their markets in India, the British eased land revenue demands after the 1850s, and revenue rates were reduced in the revised settlements.

Zamindari System

• The Zamindari System was an agreement introduced by the British East India Company in 1793 under the administration of Charles, Earl Cornwallis.
• It was also known as Permanent Settlement System, Istamrari, Jagirdari, Malguzari, and Bishvedari.
• It fixed the land revenue, affecting agricultural practices and rural politics in India during the British era.
• The objectives were to increase tax revenue, establish a western-style land market in Bengal, and promote land and agricultural investments.
• The system was part of the Cornwallis Code, which divided the East India Company’s employees into revenue, judicial, and commercial sections.
• Initially executed in Bengal and Bihar, it was later extended to other regions and ultimately became widespread across northern India.

Impact of Zamindari System

• The system favored zamindars, though they were required to pay a set sum at predetermined times; failure to do so would lead to loss of their zamindari.
• High financial demands often left zamindars vulnerable, leading to many selling their lands after the settlement.
• The population growth in Bengal led to a rise in rents, allowing zamindars to profit substantially, given that their tax remained constant.
• The Zamindars were expected to serve as intermediaries for the political dominance of British rule, preserving local custom and protecting rural life. However, they often forced their tenants into plantation-style farming of cash crops.
• Tenants were only granted some protection by the state in 1859, with a law providing limited safety to old tenants.
• The settlement provided financial stability for the colonial state, creating a group of Zamindars whose economic interests aligned with supporting colonialism.
• The Zamindari system also led to neglect of investment on the land, causing many of the worst famines of 19^th century.

Ryotwari System

• The Ryotwari system, also referred to as the Munro system, was a land revenue method implemented during British rule in India.
• It was introduced by Thomas Munro and allowed the British government to deal directly with individual farmers (ryots) for tax collection.
• The Raiyatwari system collected revenues directly from the cultivators. The land revenue was imposed directly on the Raiyats – the individual cultivators who actually worked the land. The system promised farmers the freedom to acquire or relinquish lands for cultivation.
• It was initially introduced in the Madras Presidency and was subsequently extended to other areas such as Bombay.

Impact of the Ryotwari System

• The Ryotwari system placed a significant tax burden on the farming community leading to their severe impoverishment.
• It negatively impacted the land market due to heavy taxation, leading to a substantial decline in land values.
• In regions where it was implemented, the system led to social unrest and, in some cases, rebellions.
• It weakened the middle tier and strengthened peasant rights.
• Over time, the system induced changes in the pattern of landholdings, influencing the agrarian economy and rural social fabric.
• In Raiyatwari areas, the government implicitly or explicitly assumed the responsibility of making investment. This led to greater irrigation development in the Raiyatwari areas.

Mahalwari System

• The Mahalwari system was a revenue collection method implemented in British India in 1822 by Holt Mackenzie.
• This system was named after the Hindi term ‘Mahal‘, meaning house, district or neighbourhood.
• Local landlords, known as Lambardars or Nambardars, representing individual or clusters of villages, were collectively responsible for tax payment.
• In this, the government dealt directly with the cultivators and recognized no middlemen. Each village was carefully surveyed, and every cultivator’s holding or plot of land in it was marked and separately numbered.
• The system was prevalent mainly in Uttar Pradesh, the North Western province, some parts of Central India, and Punjab.

Impact of the Mahalwari System

• The system reduced the control of large landholders or Taluqdars, enabling a more direct form of taxation.
• The high tax demands led to the economic downfall of communities, resulting in the transfer of lands to merchants and moneylenders.
• Due to high taxation, potential land buyers anticipated minimal profit, making it difficult to sell lands.
• The financial burden on farmers led to widespread impoverishment and instigated uprisings in 1857.

Differences Between Zamindari, Ryotwari, and Mahalwari Systems

Land Ownership and Tax Collection

• In Zamindari system, the Zamindars, or landlords, were the intermediaries between the government and the cultivators. They owned the land and were responsible for collecting taxes from the cultivators.
• The Raiyatwari system was a direct settlement between the government and the cultivators (Raiyats). The cultivators were the owners of the land and paid taxes directly to the government.
• The Mahalwari system was a mix of the Zamindari and Raiyatwari systems. The revenue was collected from a group of villages (Mahal), and the responsibility of tax collection was on the village headmen.

Impact on Society and Social Order

• The Zamindari system led to a commercialization of land and a change in the social background of the ruling class. The new landlords often managed their land through managers and had little attachment to their land.
• The Raiyatwari system recognized no middlemen. Each village was carefully surveyed, and the revenue was assessed on each occupant. This right of occupancy could be inherited and transferred by the peasants.
• The Mahalwari system acquired the traits of the Zamindari system in certain areas where the government laid stress on joint responsibility of the village for land revenue assessment.

Permanency of Settlement

• The Zamindari system was a permanent settlement. The Zamindars held the lands in perpetuity with a fixed tax burden.
• The Raiyatwari and Mahalwari systems were temporary settlements with the possibility of revision of tax rates.

Impact on Agricultural Practices

• In the Zamindari system, there was a shift towards cash crops like indigo and cotton, which led to several famines in the 19th century.
• In the Raiyatwari system, the cultivators had more freedom to choose their crops.

Investment in Land

• In the Zamindari system, the responsibility of investment in land was on the Zamindars.
• In the Raiyatwari system, the government implicitly or explicitly assumed the responsibility of investment.

Similarities Between Zamindari, Ryotwari, and Mahalwari Systems

• Revenue Collection: All three systems were methods of revenue collection implemented by the British East India Company.
• Impact on Society: All three systems had a significant impact on the social order and agricultural practices of the time.
• Creation of a Land Market: All three systems led to the creation of a land market, which previously did not exist. This was due to the policy of auctioning lands in arrears.
• Commercialization of Land: All three systems led to the commercialization of land, which was a new concept in India at the time.
• Influence on Land Tenur: All three systems influenced the land tenure system in India, with the Zamindari system leading to the creation of a landlord class, the Raiyatwari system leading to individual cultivators owning land, and the Mahalwari system leading to a mix of both.
• Evolution Over Time: All three systems underwent changes over time, with features intermixing and evolving. For example, the Mahalwari system acquired traits of the Zamindari system in some regions.
• Impact on Cultivators: In all three systems, the cultivators were often at the mercy of the tax demands, which could lead to distress and hardship, especially during times of natural disasters.
• Introduction of Ownership: All three systems introduced the concept of land ownership, which was a new idea in India at the time. This led to a shift in agrarian relations towards a more contractual and commercial basis.

Conclusion

The British-era land revenue systems deeply influenced India’s agrarian economy, introducing concepts of land ownership, leading to commercialization, and causing distress among cultivators. A deep understanding of these systems helps appreciate the historical context behind current land ownership patterns and farming issues in India.

Ref:Source-1

FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)